Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Those Sinister Baptists

In an article over at First Things, Ross Douthat, whom I seem to be reading alot of lately, pokes at the angry beehive of "theocracy mongers". That is, the group of folks who warn of impending theocracy in the United States.

But the various authors are in agreement about the main point, which is that something has gone terribly wrong with the separation of church and state in this country, and that America is poised to fall into the hands of people only one step from the ayatollahs. Today’s battles aren’t just a matter of ordinary political factionalism, they insist. The hour is much later than that, and nothing less than the republic itself hangs in the balance.
To understand what, precisely, the anti-theocrats think has gone so wrong, it’s necessary to understand what they mean by the term theocracy. This is no easy task. The word is often used to connote government by a specific institutional faith—Shia imams in Iran, say, or Wahhabi clerics in Afghanistan—with the clergy writing laws and a temple guard enforcing them. But the clout of institutional religion is at low ebb in American politics. No prelate wields the kind of authority that Catholic bishops once enjoyed over urban voters, no denomination can claim the kind of influence that once belonged to the old WASP mainline, and the evangelical Protestantism that figures so prominently in anti-theocracy tracts is distinguished precisely by its lack of any centralized ecclesiastical government.

Occasionally, the anti-theocrats flirt with the possibility that one institutional church or another might pose a threat to the democratic order. In American Theocracy, for instance, Kevin Phillips waxes paranoid about the Southern Baptist Convention’s role as the “state church” of the South, and he tallies, darkly, the number of Baptists who have insinuated themselves into the highest levels of American government. But for the most part, the sum of all secular fears is slightly—but only slightly—more plausible than a Southern Baptist caesaropapism.


As always, read the rest. Those who babble about the sinister theocratic influence in our nation either are clueless about actual religious practice in this country or folks like Michael Newdow who use every opportunity to expose thier own deep seated phobia that someone, somewhere just might be worshiping.

2 comments:

WhidbeyIslander said...

From The Daily Gut:

For the left, the war on terrorism is as false a pursuit as the war on drugs, and really we have far bigger threats to worry about. Recite them with me:

* global warming
* the curbing of our freedoms in Bush's war on terrorism
* global warming
* oh, and global warming

And then there are Christians. In the leftwing world rightwing Christians are more dangerous than nutbag muslims - even though no rightwing christian has never flown a plane into a building. I will admit that serious Christians tend to make terrible music, but their religion forbids them from hurting people.

http://www.dailygut.com/?i=655

Taleena said...

So Bach, Handel and Watts don't count as serious Christians? I know he was talking about modern Christians but the sweeping statement is irritating. I rather think Jars of Clay makes better music than most out there.